XTO ENERGY INC.
v.
SMITH PRODUCTION INC.
v.
SMITH PRODUCTION INC.
Granted
for about 1 month
Recent Events
- 7 days ago: Call received
7 days ago: Call received
4 days ago: Motion to dismiss filed
Today: Motion to dismiss disposed View Sheet
Today: Petition for Review disposed View Sheet
Docket Sheet
| 2009-04-03 | m/e/t to file petition for review filed – Petitioner |
| 2009-04-06 | m/e/t to file petition for review disposed of – Petitioner View Sheet |
| 2009-04-30 | Notice requesting filing fee – Petitioner |
| 2009-04-30 | PETITION FOR REVIEW FILED – Petitioner |
| 2009-04-30 | Appendix to Brief filed – Petitioner |
| 2009-05-01 | Call received – Petitioner |
| 2009-05-13 | Response to Petition for Review waived (see remark – Respondent |
| 2009-05-19 | Case forwarded to Court – |
| 2009-06-24 | Supreme Court of Texas Requested Response; mailbox rule does not apply – Indicates filing re Petition for Review |
| 2009-07-24 | response to petition for review filed – Respondent |
| 2009-08-07 | reply filed – Petitioner |
| 2009-08-26 | briefing on the merits requested – Indicates filing re Petition for Review |
| 2009-08-31 | Record Requested in Petition for Review – |
| 2009-09-14 | Case Record Filed – Clerk of the Court of Appeals |
| 2009-09-25 | Brief filed. – Petitioner |
| 2009-10-01 | Motion for extension of time to file brief. – Respondent |
| 2009-10-02 | Motion for Extension of Time disposed. – Respondent View Sheet |
| 2009-11-12 | Phone call from Clerk's Office – Petitioner |
| 2009-11-12 | Motion for extension of time to file brief. – Petitioner |
| 2009-11-12 | Motion for extension of time to file brief. – Respondent |
| 2009-11-16 | Letter sent to parties from Supreme Court - See Remarks – Petitioner View Sheet |
| 2009-11-16 | Motion for Extension of Time disposed. – Respondent View Sheet |
| 2009-11-16 | Motion for Extension of Time disposed. – Petitioner's Reply Brief View Sheet |
| 2009-12-14 | Brief filed. – Respondent |
| 2010-01-19 | Reply brief – Petitioner |
| 2010-04-09 | Petition for Review disposed – OA date & time not set. View Sheet |
| 2010-04-09 | Petition for Review granted – |
| 2010-07-16 | Case set for oral argument – Indicates filing re Petition for Review |
| 2010-07-22 | Oral Argument Submission Form from Attorney received – Respondent |
| 2010-07-28 | Oral Argument Submission Form from Attorney received – Petitioner |
| 2010-08-27 | Call received – Petitioner |
| 2010-08-27 | Call received – Petitioner |
| 2010-08-30 | Motion to dismiss filed – Petitioner |
| 2010-09-03 | Motion to dismiss disposed – View Sheet |
| 2010-09-03 | Petition for Review disposed – To identify a cause in View Sheet |
Parties in the Texas Supreme Court
XTO Energy Inc., petitioner
see attorneys
Smith Production Inc., respondent see attorneys
Arrange by Attorney
Smith Production Inc., respondent see attorneys
Arrange by Attorney
Texas Supreme Court Order Lists
Court of Appeals Opinions
Courts Below
Court of Appeals:
Houston (14th COA)
No. 14-07-00069-CV docket
by Honorable Kem Thompson Frost
Trial Court:
Harris County
Honorable David J. Bernal
Houston (14th COA)
No. 14-07-00069-CV docket
by Honorable Kem Thompson Frost
Trial Court:
Harris County
Honorable David J. Bernal
Briefs in the Texas Supreme Court
Petition for Review - Filed: 04/30/2009 (2009-04-30)
Reply in Support of Petition - Filed: 08/07/2009 (2009-08-07)
Petitioner's Brief on the Merits - Filed: 09/25/2009 (2009-09-25)
Response to Petition - Filed: 07/24/2009 (2009-07-24)
Respondent's Brief on the Merits - Filed: 12/14/2009 (2009-12-14)
