You are looking at a DocketDB detail page about an archived case from the Texas Supreme Court. To learn more, click here.
COLUMBIA MEDICAL CENTER OF LAS COLINAS, INC. D/B/A LAS COLINAS MEDICAL CENTER
v.
ATHENA HOGUE, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS EXECUTRIX OF THE ESTATE OF ROBERT HOGUE, JR., DECEASED, CHRISTOPHER HOGUE, AND ROBERT HOGUE, III
Closed

Articles Mentioning This Case

Order List for June 19, 2009 SCOTXblog (June 19, 2009)
Opinions Issued

Wainwright Jefferson Hecht Oneill Brister Medina Green Johnson Willett Justice Wainwright delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Chief Justice Jefferson, Justice O'Neill, Justice Brister, Justice Medina, Justice Johnson, and Justice Willett joined, and in Parts II-A, II-C, and II-D of which Justice Hecht and Justice Green joined. (PDF)
Brister Medina Justice Brister delivered a concurring opinion, in which Justice Medina joined. (PDF)
Green Hecht Justice Green delivered an opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part, in which Justice Hecht joined. (PDF)
Wainwright Hecht Brister Justice Wainwright delivered an opinion, in which Justice Hecht and Justice Brister joined, dissenting to the denial. (PDF)
Last Texas Supreme Court docket entry about 1 year ago
Docket Sheet
2004-06-24 m/e/t to file petition for review filed – Petitioner
2004-06-25 m/e/t to file petition for review disposed of –   View Sheet
2004-07-26 PETITION FOR REVIEW FILED – Petitioner
2004-07-26 appendix to any instrument – Petitioner
2004-07-29 Response to Petition for Review waived (see remark – Respondent
2004-08-10 Case forwarded to Court –  
2004-08-20 2ND PETITION FOR REVIEW FILED – Petitioner
2004-08-23 Notice requesting filing fee – Indicates filing re Petition for Review
2004-08-31 Case forwarded to Court –  
2004-10-19 briefing on the merits requested – Indicates filing re Petition for Review
2004-10-26 Record Requested in Petition for Review –  
2004-11-17 Letter Received –  
2004-11-17 Phone call from Clerk's Office. –  
2004-11-18 motion to withdraw – Respondent
2004-11-18 Motion for extension of time to file brief. – Petitioner
2004-11-23 motion for extension of time (remarks) – Petitioner View Sheet
2004-11-29 Brief filed. – Petitioner
2004-11-29 Motion for leave to file brief – Petitioner
2004-11-29 call from atty in case – Petitioner
2004-12-02 Motion for leave to file brief disposed –   View Sheet
2004-12-09 Record Received (See Remarks) –   View Sheet
2004-12-10 Petition for Review under Rule 53 Disposed of – Indicates filing re Petition for Review View Sheet
2004-12-10 Motion to withdraw disposed of – Petitioner View Sheet
2004-12-14 Brief filed. – Respondent
2004-12-29 Reply brief. – Petitioner
2005-02-11 pet/rev granted –  
2005-02-11 Petition for Review under Rule 53 Disposed of –   View Sheet
2005-02-11 Case set for oral argument – Indicates filing re Petition for Review
2005-03-02 Electronic Copy of Brief Posted to Web – Respondent
2005-03-07 Electronic Copy of Brief Posted to Web – Petitioner
2005-03-07 Electronic Copy of Brief Posted to Web – Petitioner
2005-03-07 Electronic Copy of Brief Posted to Web – Petitioner
2005-04-12 Oral argument - –  
2005-04-13 Post submission brief – Respondent
2005-04-22 Post submission brief – Petitioner
2005-04-26 response to petition for review filed – Respondent
2007-04-24 Post submission brief – Respondent
2007-05-29 response to petition for review filed – Petitioner
2008-08-29 Opinion issued – To identify a cause in
2008-08-29 Concurring opinion issued. –  
2008-08-29 Court approved judgment sent to attys of record –  
2008-08-29 concurring and dissenting opinion delivered –  
2008-09-12 M/E/T to file Motion for Rehearing disposed –   View Sheet
2008-09-12 m/e/t to file motion for rehearing – Petitioner
2008-09-24 Motion for Rehearing - Filed – petitioner's motion for rehearing of cause filed
2008-09-24 Case forwarded to Court –  
2009-01-16 Motion for Rehearing - Disposed – To identify a cause in View Sheet
2009-01-16 Mandate Issued –  
2009-02-02 Case stored in record room –  
2009-02-04 Miscellaneous motion filed. See Remarks. – Petitioner View Sheet
2009-02-11 File instrument. – Respondent
2009-02-18 Supreme Court of Texas Requested Response; mailbox rule does not apply –  
2009-02-27 Response to Motion – Respondent
2009-03-11 Reply to motion – Petitioner
2009-06-19 Dissenting opinion issued. –  
2009-06-19 Miscellaneous motion disposed. See Remarks. –   View Sheet
Parties in the Texas Supreme Court
Columbia Medical Center of Las Colinas, Inc., petitioner see attorneys

Hogue, Ms. Athena, respondent see attorneys

Estate of Robert Hogue, Jr., Deceased, respondent see attorneys

Hogue, Mr. Christopher, respondent see attorneys

Hogue, III, Mr. Robert, respondent see attorneys

Arrange by Attorney