You are looking at a DocketDB detail page about an archived case from the Texas Supreme Court. To learn more, click here.
CITY OF SAN ANTONIO
v.
CHARLES POLLOCK AND TRACY POLLOCK, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS NEXT FRIENDS OF SARAH JANE POLLOCK, A MINOR CHILD
Closed
Opinions Issued

Hecht Jefferson Wainwright Brister Johnson Willett
Opinion of the Court
Justice Hecht delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Chief Justice Jefferson, Justice Wainwright, Justice Johnson, and Justice Willett joined, and in all but Part II-C of which Justice Brister joined. (PDF)
Medina Oneill
Dissenting
Justice Medina delivered a dissenting opinion, in which Justice O'Neill joined. (PDF)
Last Texas Supreme Court docket entry about 1 year ago
Docket Sheet
2004-12-17 m/e/t to file petition for review filed – Petitioner
2004-12-21 m/e/t to file petition for review disposed of – Petitioner View Sheet
2005-01-27 second m/e/t to file petition for review filed – Petitioner
2005-01-27 second m/e/t to file pet/review disposed of – Petitioner View Sheet
2005-02-07 PETITION FOR REVIEW FILED – Petitioner
2005-02-07 appendix to any instrument – Petitioner
2005-02-15 Amicus Curiae Brief received and placed w/record – Received (instead of filed)
2005-02-16 Response to Petition for Review waived (see remark – Respondent
2005-02-17 call from atty in case – Respondent
2005-02-22 Document received (See Remarks) – Respondent View Sheet
2005-02-22 Case forwarded to Court –  
2005-03-23 response to requested; due ____; see remarks – Indicates filing re Petition for Review View Sheet
2005-04-21 response to petition for review filed – Respondent
2005-05-06 reply filed – Petitioner
2005-06-09 briefing on the merits requested – Indicates filing re Petition for Review
2005-06-09 Record Requested in Petition for Review –  
2005-06-24 Motion for extension of time to file brief. – Petitioner
2005-06-27 Case Record Filed –  
2005-06-29 motion for extension of time (remarks) – Petitioner View Sheet
2005-07-07 Motion for extension of time to file brief. – Petitioner
2005-07-11 motion for extension of time (remarks) – Petitioner View Sheet
2005-08-30 Brief filed. – Petitioner
2005-09-07 Electronic Copy of Brief Posted to Web – Petitioner
2005-09-13 Motion for extension of time to file brief. – Respondent
2005-09-19 motion for extension of time (remarks) – Respondent View Sheet
2005-09-29 Brief filed. – Respondent
2005-10-04 Electronic Copy of Brief Posted to Web – Respondent
2005-10-10 Motion for extension of time to file brief. – Petitioner
2005-10-13 motion for extension of time (remarks) – Petitioner's reply brief View Sheet
2005-10-25 Electronic Copy of Brief Posted to Web – Amicus Curiae
2005-10-28 Electronic Copy of Brief Posted to Web – Petitioner
2005-10-28 Reply brief. – Petitioner
2006-05-05 pet/rev granted –  
2006-05-05 Petition for Review under Rule 53 Disposed of – OA date & time not set. View Sheet
2006-05-10 Electronic Copy of Brief Posted to Web – Petitioner
2006-05-10 Electronic Copy of Brief Posted to Web – Petitioner
2006-05-17 Electronic Copy of Brief Posted to Web – Respondent
2006-07-07 Case set for oral argument – Indicates filing re Petition for Review
2006-08-25 Amicus Curiae Brief received and placed w/record – Received (instead of filed)
2006-10-05 Motion to Argue – Amicus Curiae
2006-10-05 Motion to expand time for oral argument – Amicus Curiae
2006-10-05 call from atty in case – Respondent
2006-10-06 Electronic Copy of Brief Posted to Web – Amicus Curiae
2006-10-09 Response to Motion – Respondent
2006-10-13 Motion to Argue Disposed of. –   View Sheet
2006-10-13 Motion to expand time for oral argument disposed –   View Sheet
2006-10-18 Oral argument - –  
2008-08-29 Address Change – Respondent
2009-05-01 Dissenting opinion issued. –  
2009-05-01 Opinion issued – To identify a cause in
2009-05-01 Court approved judgment sent to attys of record –  
2009-05-15 Motion for Rehearing - Filed – respondent's motion for rehearing of cause filed
2009-06-26 Motion for Rehearing - Disposed – To identify a cause in View Sheet
2009-06-26 Mandate Issued –  
2009-07-16 Case stored in record room –  
Parties in the Texas Supreme Court
City of San Antonio, petitioner see attorneys

Pollock , Charles, respondent see attorneys

Pollock , Tracy, respondent see attorneys

Pollock , Sarah Jane, respondent see attorneys

State of Texas, amicus curiae
      appears in 5 other active cases see attorneys

Arrange by Attorney
Court of Appeals Opinions

DENIED August 18, 2004
AFRVRN May 12, 2004
Courts Below
Court of Appeals:
San Antonio (4th COA)
No. 04-03-00403-CV docket
by Honorable Karen A. Angelini

Trial Court:
Bexar County
Honorable Andy Mireles