You are looking at a DocketDB detail page about an active case pending in the Texas Supreme Court. To learn more, click here.
EXXON CORPORATION AND EXXON TEXAS, INC.
v.
EMERALD OIL & GAS COMPANY, L.C.
Granted for 9 months
Opinions Issued

Wainwright Jefferson Hecht Brister Medina Green Johnson Willett Justice Wainwright delivered the opinion of the Court. (PDF)
Last Texas Supreme Court docket entry 7 months ago
Docket Sheet
2005-09-09 PETITION FOR REVIEW FILED – Petitioner
2005-09-09 Appendix to Brief filed – Petitioner
2005-10-18 Case forwarded to Court –  
2005-12-01 Additional citations received. – Petitioner
2005-12-08 response to requested; due ____; see remarks – Indicates filing re Petition for Review View Sheet
2006-01-06 M/E/T to file response – Respondent
2006-01-06 Phone call from Clerk's Office. – Respondent
2006-01-10 motion for extension of time (remarks) – ** See Remarks View Sheet
2006-01-24 response to petition for review filed – Respondent
2006-02-08 reply filed – Petitioner
2006-04-03 briefing on the merits requested – Indicates filing re Petition for Review
2006-04-04 Record Requested in Petition for Review –  
2006-04-18 Electronic Copy of Brief Posted to Web – Petitioner
2006-04-18 Electronic Copy of Brief Posted to Web – Petitioner
2006-04-19 Case Record Filed –  
2006-04-20 Electronic Copy of Brief Posted to Web – Respondent
2006-05-03 Brief filed. – Petitioner
2006-05-11 Electronic Copy of Brief Posted to Web – Petitioner
2006-05-15 Motion for extension of time to file brief. – Respondent
2006-05-15 Designation of Lead Counsel for (remarks) – Respondent View Sheet
2006-05-17 motion for extension of time (remarks) – Respondent View Sheet
2006-06-21 Motion for extension of time to file brief. – Respondent
2006-06-26 motion for extension of time (remarks) – Respondent View Sheet
2006-07-17 Brief filed. – Respondent
2006-07-25 Electronic Copy of Brief Posted to Web – Respondent
2006-08-01 Reply brief. – Petitioner
2006-08-02 Electronic Copy of Brief Posted to Web – Petitioner
2006-10-20 Address Change – Petitioner
2006-10-27 Petition for Review under Rule 53 Disposed of –   View Sheet
2006-10-27 pet/rev granted –  
2006-10-27 Case set for oral argument – Indicates filing re Petition for Review
2007-01-10 Response to amicus curiae brief – Respondent
2007-01-18 Electronic Copy of Brief Posted to Web – Respondent
2007-01-31 Amicus Curiae Brief received and placed w/record – Received (instead of filed)
2007-02-05 Electronic Copy of Brief Posted to Web – Amicus Curiae
2007-02-09 Phone call from Clerk's Office. –  
2007-02-13 Exhibits in case/cause filed – Petitioner
2007-02-13 Exhibits in case/cause filed – Respondent
2007-02-13 Oral argument - –  
2007-03-08 Phone call from Clerk's Office. – Petitioner
2007-04-19 Post submission brief – Petitioner
2007-04-23 Electronic Copy of Brief Posted to Web – Petitioner
2007-11-28 Response to brief – Respondent
2007-11-28 Post submission brief – Respondent
2007-11-30 Electronic Copy of Brief Posted to Web – Respondent
2008-01-09 reply filed – Petitioner
2008-02-19 Brief filed – Respondent
2008-12-12 Address Change – Respondent
2009-03-27 Opinion issued – To identify a cause in
2009-03-27 Court approved judgment sent to attys of record –  
2009-04-16 m/e/t to file motion for rehearing – Respondent
2009-04-17 M/E/T to file Motion for Rehearing disposed – Respondent View Sheet
2009-05-12 m/e/t to file motion for rehearing – Respondent
2009-05-14 M/E/T to file Motion for Rehearing disposed –   View Sheet
2009-06-02 Motion for Rehearing - Filed – respondent's motion for rehearing of cause filed
2009-06-02 Case forwarded to Court –  
2009-07-02 Amicus Curiae Letter Received – Received (instead of filed)
2009-07-13 Amicus Curiae Letter Received – Received (instead of filed)
2009-07-30 Amicus Curiae Brief received – Received (instead of filed)
2009-08-13 Amicus Curiae Brief received – Received (instead of filed)
2009-11-09 File instrument. – Respondent
2009-11-20 Motion for Rehearing - Disposed –   View Sheet
2009-11-20 Motion for Rehearing Granted –  
2009-11-20 Supreme Court of Texas Requested Response; mailbox rule does not apply – Indicates motion for rehearing. See Event
2009-12-10 M/E/T to file response – Petitioner
2009-12-10 Motion for Extension of Time disposed. – ** See Remarks View Sheet
2010-01-11 Response to Motion for Rehearing – Petitioner
Parties in the Texas Supreme Court