You are looking at a DocketDB detail page about an archived case from the Texas Supreme Court. To learn more, click here.
THE STATE OF TEXAS
v.
CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY SIGN ASSOCIATES, ET AL.
Closed
Opinions Issued

Oneill Jefferson Hecht Wainwright Medina Green Johnson Willett
Opinion of the Court
Justice O'Neill delivered the opinion of the Court. (PDF)
Last Texas Supreme Court docket entry 6 months ago
Docket Sheet
2008-01-22 PETITION FOR REVIEW FILED – Petitioner
2008-01-22 Appendix to Brief filed – Petitioner
2008-02-11 M/E/T to file response – Respondent
2008-02-12 motion for extension of time (remarks) – ** See Remarks View Sheet
2008-03-17 response to petition for review filed – Respondent
2008-03-18 Case forwarded to Court –  
2008-03-27 Amicus Curiae Brief received and placed w/record – Received (instead of filed)
2008-04-08 Motion to extend time to file reply – Petitioner
2008-04-08 reply filed – Petitioner
2008-04-09 MET to file reply disposed of – Petitioner View Sheet
2008-05-19 Record Requested in Petition for Review –  
2008-05-19 briefing on the merits requested – Indicates filing re Petition for Review
2008-06-10 Electronic Copy of Brief Posted to Web – Petitioner
2008-06-10 Electronic Copy of Brief Posted to Web – Respondent
2008-06-10 Electronic Copy of Brief Posted to Web – Amicus Curiae
2008-06-10 Electronic Copy of Brief Posted to Web – Petitioner
2008-06-12 Case Record Filed – Clerk of the Court of Appeals
2008-06-16 Motion for extension of time to file brief. – Petitioner
2008-06-17 motion for extension of time (remarks) – Petitioner View Sheet
2008-07-18 Brief filed. – Petitioner
2008-07-22 Phone call from Clerk's Office. – Respondent
2008-07-22 Motion for extension of time to file brief. – Respondent
2008-07-24 motion for extension of time (remarks) – Respondent View Sheet
2008-07-28 Electronic Copy of Brief Posted to Web – Petitioner
2008-07-31 motion for extension of time (remarks) – Respondent View Sheet
2008-07-31 Motion for extension of time to file brief. – Respondent
2008-08-12 Motion to Strike – Respondent
2008-08-19 Supreme Court of Texas Requested Response; due no later than 3:00 p.m.; mailbox rule does not apply – Event and/or disposition refers to mandamus
2008-08-19 Motion for extension of time to file brief. – Respondent
2008-08-19 call from atty in case – Petitioner
2008-08-19 Phone call from Clerk's Office. – Petitioner
2008-08-26 call from atty in case – Petitioner
2008-08-27 motion for extension of time (remarks) – ** See Remarks View Sheet
2008-08-27 M/E/T to file response – Petitioner
2008-08-27 Motion for extension of time to file brief. – Respondent
2008-09-05 Response to Motion – Petitioner
2008-09-12 motion to strike disposed of –   View Sheet
2008-09-12 motion for extension of time (remarks) – Respondent View Sheet
2008-09-12 motion for extension of time (remarks) – Respondent View Sheet
2008-09-12 Phone call from Clerk's Office. –  
2008-09-26 Brief filed. – Respondent
2008-09-26 Brief filed. – Respondent
2008-09-29 Electronic Copy of Brief Posted to Web – Respondent
2008-10-10 Motion for extension of time to file brief. – Petitioner
2008-10-14 motion for extension of time (remarks) – Petitioner's reply brief View Sheet
2008-10-30 Reply brief. – Petitioner
2008-11-14 Petition for Review under Rule 53 Disposed of –   View Sheet
2008-11-14 pet/rev granted –  
2008-11-14 Case set for oral argument – Indicates filing re Petition for Review
2008-12-01 Amicus Curiae Brief received – Received (instead of filed)
2008-12-11 Oral Argument Submission Form from Attorney received – Respondent
2008-12-15 Oral Argument Submission Form from Attorney received – Respondent
2008-12-23 Oral Argument Submission Form from Attorney received – Petitioner
2009-01-09 Response to amicus curiae brief – Petitioner
2009-01-13 oral argument - –  
2009-01-13 Oral argument - –  
2009-01-13 Exhibits in case/cause filed – Respondent
2009-01-20 Post submission brief – Respondent
2009-02-20 Response to brief – Petitioner
2009-03-11 Motion for extension of time to file brief. – Petitioner
2009-03-26 Post submission brief – Respondent
2009-05-29 Amicus Curiae Brief received – Received (instead of filed)
2009-06-16 Notice from Counsel of a change in address – Respondent
2009-06-26 Opinion issued – To identify a cause in
2009-06-26 Court approved judgment sent to attys of record –  
2009-07-14 m/e/t to file motion for rehearing – Respondent
2009-07-16 M/E/T to file Motion for Rehearing disposed – Respondent View Sheet
2009-07-31 Motion for Rehearing - Filed – respondent's motion for rehearing of cause filed
2009-07-31 Case forwarded to Court –  
2009-09-24 Supreme Court of Texas Requested Response; mailbox rule does not apply – Indicates motion for rehearing. See Event
2009-10-09 Response to Motion for Rehearing – petitioner's motion for rehearing of cause filed
2009-10-21 Reply to motion for rehearing – Respondent
2009-11-12 Response to reply – Petitioner
2009-11-20 Previous opinion withdrawn –  
2009-11-20 Court approved judgment sent to attys of record –  
2009-11-20 Opinion issued – To identify a cause in
2009-11-20 Motion for Rehearing - Disposed – To identify a cause in View Sheet
2010-01-08 Mandate issued –  
2010-02-10 Case stored in record room –  
Parties in the Texas Supreme Court
The State of Texas, petitioner see attorneys

Central Expressway Sign Associates, respondent see attorneys

Viacom Outdoor, Inc., respondent see attorneys

City of Burleson, amicus curiae see attorneys

Outdoor Advertising Association of America, amicus curiae see attorneys

Lawler, H. Roger, amicus curiae see attorneys

Arrange by Attorney
Court of Appeals Opinions

Opinion of August 31, 2007
Courts Below
Court of Appeals:
Dallas (5th COA)
No. 05-06-00003-CV docket
by Honorable Michael O'Neill

Trial Court:
Dallas County
Honorable W. Bruce Woody