You are looking at a DocketDB detail page about an active case pending in the Texas Supreme Court. To learn more, click here.
KIRBY LAKE DEVELOPMENT, LTD., MITER DEVELOPMENT CO., L.L.C. AND TAYLOR LAKE, LTD. AND FRIENDSWOOD DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LTD.
v.
CLEAR LAKE CITY WATER AUTHORITY
Decided for 7 days
Opinions Issued

Jefferson Hecht Wainwright Medina Green Johnson Willett Lehrmann Chief Justice Jefferson delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Justice Hecht, Justice Wainwright, Justice Medina, Justice Green, Justice Johnson, and Justice Lehrmann joined, and in which Justice Willett joined as to all parts except footnote 7. (PDF)
Recent Events
    7 days ago: Opinion issued
    7 days ago: Court approved judgment sent to attys of record
Docket Sheet
2008-12-02 m/e/t to file petition for review filed – Petitioner
2008-12-03 m/e/t to file petition for review disposed of – Petitioner View Sheet
2008-12-11 second m/e/t to file pet/review disposed of – Petitioner View Sheet
2008-12-11 second m/e/t to file petition for review filed – Petitioner
2009-01-16 PETITION FOR REVIEW FILED – Petitioner
2009-01-16 Appendix to Brief filed – Petitioner
2009-01-20 Motion to Consolidate two or more cases filed – Petitioner
2009-01-23 Response to Petition for Review waived (see remark – Respondent
2009-01-27 Case forwarded to Court –  
2009-02-23 Supreme Court of Texas Requested Response; mailbox rule does not apply – Indicates filing re Petition for Review
2009-03-16 M/E/T to file response – Respondent
2009-03-17 motion for extension of time (remarks) – ** See Remarks View Sheet
2009-03-19 Letter from Supreme Court - See Remarks –   View Sheet
2009-04-24 response to petition for review filed – Respondent
2009-05-20 Motion to extend time to file reply – Petitioner
2009-05-22 MET to file reply disposed of – Petitioner View Sheet
2009-05-29 Cases consolidated by Supreme Court –  
2009-05-29 motion to consolidate acted on –  
2009-06-01 reply filed – Petitioner
2009-06-12 Record Requested in Petition for Review –  
2009-06-12 briefing on the merits requested – Indicates filing re Petition for Review
2009-06-24 Case Record Filed – Clerk of the Court of Appeals
2009-07-06 Case Record Filed – Clerk of the Court of Appeals
2009-07-14 Appendix to Brief filed – Petitioner
2009-07-14 Brief filed. – Petitioner
2009-07-28 Motion for extension of time to file brief. – Respondent
2009-07-30 motion for extension of time (remarks) – Respondent View Sheet
2009-08-24 Brief filed. – Respondent
2009-09-08 Reply brief. – Petitioner
2009-10-23 Petition for Review granted –  
2009-10-23 Petition for Review disposed –   View Sheet
2009-10-23 Case set for oral argument – Indicates filing re Petition for Review
2009-10-29 Oral Argument Submission Form from Attorney received – Petitioner
2009-12-07 Oral Argument Submission Form from Attorney received – Respondent
2010-01-15 Amicus Curiae Brief received – Received (instead of filed)
2010-01-19 Oral argument –  
2010-02-11 Amicus Curiae Brief received – Received (instead of filed)
2010-08-27 Opinion issued – To identify a cause in
2010-08-27 Court approved judgment sent to attys of record –  
Parties in the Texas Supreme Court
Kirby Lake Development, Ltd., petitioner see attorneys

Clear Lake City Water Authority, respondent see attorneys

Greater Houston Builders Association, amicus curiae see attorneys

Texas Municipal League, amicus curiae
      appears in 2 other active cases see attorneys

Arrange by Attorney